The Doctrine of Ultra Vires under Malaysian Company Law - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2344 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Best Score Essay Type Analytical essay Did you like this example? Discuss the doctrine of ultra vires and its effect in Malaysian Company Law. According to s18 Contract Act 1965, every company formed should have a memorandum printed and divided into paragraph and with the date stated. In s18 (b) Contract Act 1965, it shows that the requirement of the Memorandum of Association (M/A) required a statement of object clause. The object clause can be used to describe the nature of the business such as manufacturing business, merchandising business or service business. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Doctrine of Ultra Vires under Malaysian Company Law" essay for you Create order Besides, it also show the company power, its purpose and the legal capacity of the company.[1] Furthermore, the purpose of the object of M/A should be lawful as stated in s14 (1) Company Act 1965. The consequence of unlawful purpose and incompatible to peace, welfare, security, public order, good order or morality in Malaysia will be Registrar of Company will refuse for the registration of the company as followed to s16(8)(a) Company Act 1965. As it has been stated that object of M/A function as recognize the legal capacity of the company, in the same time, it has limited the company which it require the company to act based on the statement. If the operation of the company is different with the object of M/A, ultra vires will be recognized. Ultra means à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“beyondà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  whereas vires means à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“powerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  where ultra vires happened when an act is against the object clause. Although the company want to ratify the act, the act is void at initio. This can be further explained by the common law and statue. However, if the company wants to prevent ultra vires, the company must alter the object clause. There are certain requirement as stated s28 Company Act 1965. In s28 (1) Company Act 1965, it stated that alteration can be made based on a special resolution. Besides, by holding this special resolution, members and debentures holder of the company should be given 21days of notification to the special resolution as according to s28 (2) Company Act 1965. Common Law The doctrine of ultra vires under common law refers to the rules that company must act within their objects clause that is stated in the memorandum of association. Any activity that is outside from the company capacity is void. Neither the company nor the third party could enforce this. In other words, ultra vires act is void and the contract cannot be ratified even if the company wishes to. Under common law, the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s contract is void due to internal or external context. Externally, when a third party contracting with a company, if the contract was not fulfill the objects of company that stated in memorandum of association, then the contract was ultra vires and void. Internally, if the company and the director enter into an ultra vires contract, the company may immediately stop the act of the director and claim damages from the director who breach his fiduciary duties by entering into the contract which is outside from the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s capacity. If the company could not fulfill the main object in their memorandum, then they would have to be wound up. According to Ashbury Railway Carriage Iron Company v Riche (1875) LR 7HL 653, the case stated that the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s objects in their memorandum was to make, sell and hire railway carriages. The company entered into contract with Riche and the contract was approved by the shareholders at general meeting, then the company agreed to give Riche and his brother a loan to build a railway in Belgium. After that, the company changed their mind and refused the agreement. Riche sued the company. The court held that the construction of a railway was ultra vires, because construct a railway was not stated in their companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s memorandum of association. Thus, the contract is void because the construction of a railway is outside from the company capacity. Furthermore, since it is outside from the company capacity, so the company could not ratify the contract. Therefore, ultra vires exist and the contract is void even if all of the shareholders approved the contract. From Ashbury Railway Carriage case, we can see that the company could not sue or be sued by the third party for not performing the contract. This is because the contract is null and void. Thus, the company could avoid for not performing the contract and could not be sued by the third party because it is outside form the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ ž ¢s capacity. Although it seems unfair for the other party but the object clause of a company is available at public for inspection. The other party should have checked whether the company has the capacity to enter into contract with them or not. Need to say if company itself can sue the director and SH? Shareholders pay less concerned on the corporation on how the director corporate as long as the business generates dividend to them. However this will put the creditor in high risk. This is because if the creditors credit sales the goods and services to the particular company, and the company has insolvent in later dates, the creditor could not claim any debts. Common law stated that an ultra vires act is null and void to protect the member or the creditors of the company who has invested the money into the company and expect the investment is only used for the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s business. According to Cotman v Brougham (1918) A.C. 514, the objects clause of company c ontained 30 sub clauses, however, the first sub clause stated the company to develop rubber plantations. In the fourth clause, it empowered the company to deal in any shares of any company. Besides, the memorandum also stated that each sub clauses acts as the independent objects for the company. The company underwrote and had allotted to it shares in an oil company. After that, the oil company wound up and their company was on the list of contributories. The question arose is that whether this is intra vires the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s objects. The court held that the 30 independent object clause in the rubber companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s memorandum was an independent. Hence, the power to deal with the share in an oil company was within the legal power. Therefore, the company is liable for the underwriting. From the Cotman case, the company did not clearly specify the main object where constitution of Memorandum are not limited by using plain business language. Companies could n o longer avoid a contract based on the grounds that it was beyond the company objects which they have been done in the traditional ultra vires doctrine. This has increased a wider range of object clauses in the Memorandum as a result of each sub clause is independent which are not interrelated with the main clause. Hence, the object are not restricted to review on the main clause. This has rendered the companies to introduce a standard type of object clause to render almost all potential commercial objectives intra vires. Position under Companies Act 1965 According to s20 (1) of Companies Act 1965, any act or transfer of property that made by the company shall not be invalid with the reason that company dont have the power or capacity to do act. The effect for this section is transaction will become irrelevant with the fact that the company did not have the capacity to enter into it, even though a certain transaction is otherwise valid. Besides, the company can sued or be sued as acts against its object clause. In order to protect the interest of the shareholders and creditors, s20 (2) Companies Act 1965 has provided the remedies to restrain the ultra vires act. According to s20 (2) (a) Companies Act 1965, company is liable if a member of the company or the company itself has issued the debentures are available with a floating charge. The shareholders and debenture holders can sue the company for the taking any action outside the company and they can claimed the compensation from it. Besides, it also stated that the relief of s20 Companies Act 1965, the ultra vires only apply to specific person and not an outsider as refer to Pamaron Holdings Sdn Bhd v Ganda Holdings Bhd [1988] 3 MLJ 346. According to Pamaron Holdings Sdn Bhd v Ganda Holdings Bhd case, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into an agreement for sale and purchase of shares in a private limited company. The Defendant defaulted in the payment of the purchase price and the plaintiff applied for summary judgment against it. In opposing the application, the defendant proclaim that among the transaction was ultra vires the plaintiff company. Allowing the application, the court held that under s.20 a person other than a debenture holder or the minister may not raise ultra vires. The defendant being an outsider and not a debenture holder or the minister had no right under the section. The Defendant was liable for not being able to settle the payment of the purchase price. The Defendant also didnt purchase any shares or debentures from the Plaintiff Company, thus it cannot raise ultra vires. Defendant should purchase the shares or debenture from the plaintiff in order for the defendant have the right to raise ultra vires. From this case, only the person that are sufficient proximate to the company can apply ultra vires. Ultra vires is an action This act will only available to the contract that has been entered, yet to be completed as refer to the Hawkesbury Dev elopment Co Ltd v Landmark Finance Pty Ltd ( 1969 ) 2 NSWR 786. According to Hawkesbury Development Co. Ltd v Ladmark Finance Pty Ltd case, Plaintiff holds all of the shares in the Landmark Finance Pty Ltd. Landmark Finance has issued two debentures to United Dominion Corp (UDC). A request has been sent to court by Plaintiff about declaring both debentures to be invalid due that it is a company object ultra vires. Plaintiff also request that the court to prohibit the enforcement of UDC of the debentures. However, application that request by the plaintiff is rejected and the approval of court to void the declaration of the UDC had failed to be obtained. Due that the plaintiffs are the shareholders of the Landmark Finance, the application should make to Landmark Finance instead of UDC is a third party. If the company is make the act of ultra vires by issuing the debentures to the outsiders, the shareholders or debenture holders have the right to sue the company. However, s20 (2) (a ) Companies Act 1965 does not given its protection to debentures holders that secured by float charge and creditors who did not have any charge. According to s20 (2) (b) Companies Act 1965, officers are personally liable for any action taken by member of the company or the company itself. The shareholders or the company itself can sue the officers either former or current that who committed any Ultra Vires transactions which must be completed and realized. However, if any law suit against the officer will not affect the validity as stated in s20 (1) CA 1965, the act will be valid to the ground. According to s20 (2) (c) Companies Act 1965, any petition that may conducted by the Minister to the court to wind up the company that had committed ultra vires actions. The court will conducted its discretion when the company has changed the business totally from its original business. According to s20 (3) Companies Act, if any party has suffered any damage or loss due to the unautho rized act or transfer is yet to be performed and to be restrained under s20 (2) Companies Act 1965, the parties who have sustained the damage can be compensated. By comparing the common law and Companies Act 1965, under the doctrine of ultra vires, it is prefer to go for common law. This is because, under common law, the act of ultra vires is null and void, so the company could avoid for not performing the contract which is outside from their capacity. Besides, the company could not sue or be sued by others party just because they did not perform the contract. However, under the Companies Act 1965, it provides completed transactions remain valid as between the company and the third party and both of the party may sue each other. Letà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s compare the case of Ashbury Railway Carriage Iron Company v Riche under common law and the case of Hawkesbury Development Co Ltd v Landmark Finance Pty Ltd under Companies Act 1965, we can see that under Ashbury case, the ultra vir es are meant to protect the company by voiding the contract because it is outside the companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s capacity. The other party could not sue the company although they had entered into the contract because ultra vires exist. Whereas, under the Hawkesbury case, the plaintiff failed to declare the debentures to the third party although it is a company object ultra vires because the plantiff are the shareholders of the Landmark Finance and it should make declaration to Landmark Finance instead of the third party. Conclusion For under the common law, the contract entered by the director of the company or the company itself is ultra vires, the contract is considered void due that it is beyond the companys capacity to perform it. If the contract made by the company with the third party is not fulfill the objects of the company that stated in memorandum of association also considered as ultra vires thus become void. When the contract has become void, the company could not sue or be sued by the third party for not performing the contract. For under the Companies Act 1965, any act that made by the company cannot be declared as invalid by using incapable to perform the act as an excuse. The transactions still remain valid between both the company and the third party that they may able to sue or be sued by each other. Thus, both companies and the third party should consider the capabilities of the company to perform the any act from the contract in order to avoid any ultra vires that may happen and cause the loss to the creditors, shareholders, debenture holders or any related parties. [1] Pg 205 principle of business law and corporation

The Demand For High Quality Talent - 2307 Words

Essay â€Å"The demand for high quality talent is outstripping supply and this is not expected to change.† The above statement is true in today’s world economy and hence relying on local talents is not enough, so companies should also consider foreign talent markets for obtaining high quality and dedicated talents. The workplaces need to be more diverse in order to survive in today’s non-static market. What foreign talents bring is vision and experiences which might be applicable in their local market but the learning that can be obtained from those experiences will definitely help the company which plans to hire them and that learning can be applied to similar markets as well. What is meant by Diversity in Workplace? The basic concept for diversity is rapidly developing. It is no longer just about creating heterogeneous workforces, but now it is also about using that workforce to create the innovative products, services and business practices that can give a company a competitive advantage in the market. And on a global scale, as companies compete, diversity and inclusion have to frequently shift, as different markets and different cultures have varied definitions of what diversity means. In today’s market almost all executives understand that their companies cannot be successful on a global platform unless they have a diverse workforce. A diverse workforce is necessary to drive innovation, foster creativity and guide business strategies. When a company has people from multipleShow MoreRelatedEvaluating The Ideal Model Of Recruitment And Selection That Intuit s Evaluating For Awesome Program1411 Words   |  6 Pagesoutcomes can be obtained while fulfilling the company s mission, which is why the company exists. An external and internal analysis must be conducted using a SWOT analysis. When analyzing the external environment, a company is able to see where high quality talent congregates and how their top competitors are recruiting. When doing an internal analysis, they are able to see what strengths they should build on and what weaknesses they need to address. An example of a weakness is to pinpoint the skill gapsRead More1. Abstract . We Have Little Knowled ge About The Report,1693 Words   |  7 Pagesabout the report, we are discussing about the global talent management (GTM) and the role of the corporate human resource function in multinational corporations. International mobility its new forms, increased global talents hunting are the two perspectives of GTM. GTM discusses and considered primarily about the mechanisms and following the willingness to enter the emerging markets using organisational ability to maintain or managing the talents. These issues addressed or shows when once the new corporateRead MoreDcp Research Paper882 Words   |  4 PagesOnline BSN to DNP Programs: A Solution for the High-Level Talent Shortage In the United States, more than 58 million citizens live in areas that are classified as primary care shortage areas. These regions, official labeled Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs), fail to maintain a sufficient talent pool of primary care providers as outlined by federal guidelines. According to a report issued by the Kaiser Foundation, Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) have the potential to fill this void. As ofRead MoreSimultaneously, the logistics industry attracts highly educated graduates entering this industry900 Words   |  4 PagesSimultaneously, the logistics industry attracts highly educated graduates entering this industry and its quality will be improved. The logistics industry is one of four economic pillars in Hong Kong which represents 21% of Hong Kong total employment. As the logistics industry is prosperous, many high educated and skilled labors are attracted by career opportunities. From figure 15, we can see clearly that almost 70% interviewees think t hat career opportunity is the most important factor to attractRead MoreTalent Management is New Innovation Taking Over Human Resources1192 Words   |  5 Pageshuman resources (HR). The emergence of Talent Management (TM) is the innovative focus that is combined with management issues and HR methods (Bersin, 2006). How can an organisation be more efficient when recruiting new staff? How can companies identify competency issues and solve these through training or development options? How can they manage their employees to affiliate them with company goals and missions? How can organisations identify their top talent and reposition them to gain maximum outcomeRead MoreThe 21st Century : A Technology Era1332 Words   |  6 PagesThe 21st century is a technology era, and customer demands and business operations changing dramatically. In 21st century companies redefining their strategies on leadership, talent, and diversity, while evaluating their operational effectiveness through huma n resources management. Organizations’ are making decisions by relying to human resources and seeking whether it enhances the firm’s competitive advantage by adding real, measurable plans among their competitors. The HR function and its processesRead MoreStrategic Staffing Chapters 1-6851 Words   |  4 Pagestraits of job candidates with the requirements of the organization and its jobs. Chapter 2 - Resource-based view of the company - Focuses attention on the quality of the skills (more intelligent and flexible than their competitors; exhibit superior levels of cooperation and operation) of a company’s workforce at various levels, and on the quality of the motivational climate created by management. - Five Requirements of a Competitive Advantage: Resource must be valuable, rare, not easily imitated orRead MoreGe Money America Essay1125 Words   |  5 Pagesuse of a decentralized staffing process and inconsistent interview practices also contributed to the staffing dilemma. (2) Technology – existing technologies did not enable them to execute a highly successful, high-volume recruiting program with the ability to produce metrics on demand. (3) Strategy Sourcing – although the internet was and remains an important weapon in recruiting, GE money Americas want to find a more successful channel or advertising media to increase the flow of candidatesRead MoreImproving Low High School Reform916 Words   |  4 Pageslow-performing high schools become more student-centered, personalized, and intellectually rigorous through the implementation of the Breaking Ranks Model of High School Reform. The model offers a capacity-building approach to school improvement based on the recommendations of Breaking Ranks: Changing an American Institution, which was produced by the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) in partnership with the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Data-Driven High SchoolRead MoreLeadership Styles Of Leadership Style1399 Words   |  6 Pagesindividual on a team has a unique quality that they bring to the table. As a leader, it’s my responsibility to find ou t what those qualities are and leverage them in order to achieve success. I challenge people to come up with new ideas. I truly believe that as a team, we can accomplish anything as long as we work together. Personally, I’ve used Participative leadership in my role at work. If I refer back to the C.O.A.T (Communication, Opportunity, Advisor, Talent) model discussed in Module 3’s

Fate and Free Will Othello for Moor of Venice - myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theFate and Free Will Othello for Moor of Venice. Answer: As the audience agrees with the fact that Othello the Moor of Venice is one of the great tragedies of Shakespeare where the protagonist faces fateful undoing due to his flaw and suspicion. The tragic hero as the researchers convey, a man with great honour and flawless intension finally meets his doom. There the question arises that if Othello was free from malicious feature, then why did he suffered? There are ample evidences that support Othello as a ruthless and suspicious man by nature, but evidences also convey that he was completely deceived by Iago treachery and ambition. As the play opens the audience finds Othello to be a virtuous and dedicated Moor, who was deeply passionate for Desdemona. He wins whatever he desires, whether it is battle or Desdemonas heart. He is not only an army general representing his valour but also respected by his contemporaries. The audience finds no guilt in him to shoulder and he has nothing to hide. He says, I must be found. My parts, my title, and my perfect soul shall manifest me rightly. Othello handles all the matters with nobility as well as forthrightness even when he was accused of abducting Desdemona. He explains his every actions and convinces the audience as well as the court that without any magical power or using drug, he has won over his beloved. Desdemonas own accounts have supported his innocence and unadulterated love. She recounts, Othello's visage in his mind, and to his honours and his valiant parts did I my soul and fortunes consecrate". To the analysts, Othello's innocence has made him gullible and susceptible therefore, he is easily entrapped in Iagos treachery. On the contrary, the antagonist Iago is a snake hidden in the grass. He is the catalyst who sets the innocent Othello into the downward spiral of rage, jealousy, suspicion and finally violence. Iagos hatred of Othellos reputation resulted to vengeance. He masked his evil intention behind manipulation and false rhetoric. The audience will agree that this deceitful man could choose anyone and use him as pawn. He actually sought vengeance to Othello but played with each and every character that came near him. He manipulates Othello and defames Cassio as he replaces Iago in position. Again he manipulates Cassio to win back Othello through Desdemona. Now the question arises that if Othello was so innocent in his nature and loves her lady love Desdemona unconditionally, then why he distrusts her and is beguiled by the treacherous Iago. The analysts say it is the free choice of Othello that he has believed Iago instead of his wife. He was manipulated that Desdemona is not loyal to him. He feels abused therefore questions Desdemonas double dealing. He is enraged with passion and overcome with sorrow. He says, O curse of marriage, that we can call these delicate creatures ours, and not their appetites!" The fatalists convey the idea that Othello was not solely responsible for his doom but it was the play of fate that compelled him to act such a way. Fate and chance are levers that designed the actions. It is the Iagos jealousy that causes transition in the character of Othello. The role of fate in handkerchief episode is one of the most important evidence as it provides Iagos conspiracy a final shape. The fate of Othello creates room for Iago and he utilizes the opportunity full hand. To these researchers, the destiny of Othello has turned his heart into stone and throughout the play cannot realise his flaw. What fate and Iago have shown him, he has seen and cannot perceive beyond that. His madness is the direct result of the manipulation of fate and chance which ultimately convinced him to murder Desdemona in bloody passion. Only at the end of the drama, Othello realises his fault and blames himself for own demise. Having reached the rock bottom, Othello ultimately commits suicide in grief. With the unfolding of the play, the audience cannot draw a clear line between fate and will. It of the same passion that makes Othello a great general as well as a noble husband and ignites his jealousy that led him to fall. His consequence is like Adam and Eve in paradise, who were manipulated by the serpent and chose the path of their free will, ultimately fall for their own action. Othello is not an evil person but innately a noble, honest man. It is the passion that made him great and is responsible for his fatal consequence.

Thirteen Days By Robert Kennedy Essays - CubaUnited States Relations

Thirteen Days By Robert Kennedy Thirteen Days, by Robert Kennedy, is a portrayal of the drama surrounding the Cuban missile crisis, and an analysis of the ordeal. There are two sides to this conflict which was played out in the post-World War II era. On one hand you have the Communists of the Soviet Union, whose desire to bring all of Europe under their heel would nearly spark a war that would annihilate the human race. On the other stands the Americans who wished the vindication of right and to prevent the further spread of Communism. The tensions begin to mount after Germany and Berlin were divided among the victorious countries of the Allies and three major power blocs formed. The countries that had been newly formed in the aftermath of the war declared themselves to be neutral. The western countries, led by America, and the Soviet Union, along with its newly acquired countries, formed the other two. The Soviet Union had surrounded itself with Communist satellite countries, and was taking every opportunity to impose Communism onto any other country possible. In response to this policy the U.S. announced the Truman Doctrine, which was aimed at controlling the Soviet encroachment, and the Marshall Plan, designed to support the recovery of war-devastated Europe to make Communism less appealing. However, two things came to pass that sent shockwaves through the U.S. The first of which was the Communist overthrow of the Chinese government, which began to instill deeper fear of Communism. The second was the Soviet Unio ns newly discovered atomic ability. Now the U.S. was not the world superpower, did not have sole possession of the most powerful weapon in the world, the weapon that was the edge we needed to keep Communism in check. These events contributed to the anti-Communist furor that swept the country for the next twenty years which resulted in witch-hunts that ruined many lives and careers, most often unjustly due to the cases being totally fabricated and unsupported by fact. When Joseph Stalin died, power went to an obscure Communist official named Nikita Khrushchev. His goal was to have the Soviet Union be an equal to the United States militarily and economically. Although he tried to soften Stalins brutal tactics, Soviet foreign policy remained the same. This ruthless treatment of satellite nations that tried to break free fostered further distrust between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. At the inauguration of our new president, John F. Kennedy, Khrushchev decided to test Kennedys resolve with renewed pressure on Berlin via the construction of the Berlin Wall. However, none of these events were to equal the effect that came from one small island ninety miles off of the coast of Florida, the small island of Cuba. When Fidel Castro took over Cuba by means of a revolution, he quickly established his government as the first openly Communist government in the western hemisphere. He petitioned the Soviet Union for aid, which was cheerfully given him. These events went against our current policies, as well as the Monroe Doctrine, which established us as the police force of the western hemisphere. Ninety miles away from the greatest bastion of Capitalism was now residing its greatest foe. This tense situation was brought to a boiling point by the arrival of Soviet technicians and soldiers on the island, followed by shipments of Soviet technology. Our frequent U-2 flyovers had produced evidence of the beginning construction of missile sites, which we were assured were to be of a purely defensive nature. John F. Kennedy, who was young, inexperienced, and na?ve about the reality of his professional relationship with the Soviet leader, chose to trust Khrushchev on the matter of the missile sites. It was not until much later that he learned the truth, that the Soviets had actually begun construction on offensive nuclear missile sites, with missiles capable of reaching most major U.S. cities. This realization sparked a massive government operation to discover everything possible about this new threat, and at the same time to cover it up for the nonce so as not to cause a general panic. Since the Bay of Pigs incident, Kennedy no longer blindly followed the advice of his military advisors, but instead decided